Introduction: Difference between revisions

From Kungfu-Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 66: Line 66:
* Commitment to good scientific practice by all group members
* Commitment to good scientific practice by all group members
* Ensuring a continuous open dialogue about research results
* Ensuring a continuous open dialogue about research results
* Interpreting kungfu in 'data-driven' [[Scientific_methodology|processes]], defining hypothesis and testing them against all existing data (research design)
* Interpreting kungfu in 'data-driven' [[Scientific_methodology#Result_validation|processes]], defining hypothesis and testing them against all existing data (research design)
* Developing and maintaining [[Scientific_methodology|methods and standards]] like quantitative metrics to score and document the (un)certainty of all interpretations
* Developing and maintaining [[Scientific_methodology|methods and standards]] like quantitative metrics to score and document the (un)certainty of all interpretations
* Documenting our decision processes and underlying facts and providing these along with our results
* Documenting our decision processes and underlying facts and providing these along with our results

Latest revision as of 07:00, 23 January 2025

This is the kungfu-wiki introduction. It gives you an overview about the most important sections


Purpose of this wiki

This wiki displays the results of the citizen science project Key to Kungfu
We provide open knowledge about historic kungfu routines and techniques as well as our interpretations regarding fight applications.

Wiki structure

This wiki contains two main sections:

Enter warrior section

Scholar Section

Free knowledge, research results and data about kungfu applications and routine interpretation
Enter warrior section

Warrior Section

Specific training content for fighters, applying the knowledge from scholar section


Routine interpretation

This wiki is about historic kungfu routines and their practical fight applications. We split routines into separate movements, called 'postures'. Our research hypothesis is that every posture identifies a kungfu technique with a unique fighting application. This means, contrary to many traditional kungfu lineages, we assume that every posture has a single and unique application. Thus, if two routines show the same posture, we assume, that the general fight application of that posture is generally equal (just differing in small details, according to the specific situation in the routine).
See Routine theory.

The following pages reflect that research:

App icon martialartist.png

Routines

Interpretation and analysis of kungfu routines. Video content of the routine application (partner form)
App icon fight.png

Techniques

Generalized base techniques that have a specific and unique fight application that is symbolized by the postures in routines
App icon magiccircle.png

Strategy

Structure of kungfu techniques and their possible combinations
App icon mountain.png

Scholarship

Custom articles about routine theory and specific techniques of special interest


Sources and tools

We use video, image and text data to align our interpretations with historical sources and facts. Besides image and video material about routines, we strongly utilizing written records about routines, called 'QuanPu'. To ensure domain specific translation, we build specialized tools like our QuanPu Translator.

App icon book.png

Glossary

List of terms, used in quan pu and in kungfu documents. Background info about meaning and historic provenance
App icon books.png

Quan pu

Archive of historic text sources about kungfu routines (quanpu)
App icon wise man.png

Translator

Translator for quan pu content. Aligning data from Falk Dictionary of martial arts, Wiktionary.org, chinese symbol history, as well as our own research
App icon excel.png

Data

Collection of raw data material from our research. All content in this wiki is based on that


Research standard

Our research is guided by the guidelines of the German Research Foundation (DFG) to ensure good scientific practise This includes in particular:

  • Commitment to good scientific practice by all group members
  • Ensuring a continuous open dialogue about research results
  • Interpreting kungfu in 'data-driven' processes, defining hypothesis and testing them against all existing data (research design)
  • Developing and maintaining methods and standards like quantitative metrics to score and document the (un)certainty of all interpretations
  • Documenting our decision processes and underlying facts and providing these along with our results
  • Cross-phase quality assurance by testing interpretations against data, theory and praxis, especially together with martial arts practitioners from combat sports in sparring and tournaments.
  • Open access: We provide open access to all research data following the FAIR principles (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable)

KeyLogo2.png

Contact

Kolja Bailly

Kolja Bailly

Kungfu-Wiki developer, researcher and trainer